On InChI and evaluating the quality of cross-reference links

On InChI and evaluating the quality of cross-reference links
Authored by:
Jakub Galgonek
Jiří Vondrášek

Galgonek and Vondrášek Journal of Cheminformatics 2014, 6:15

Abstract

Background: There are many databases of small molecules focused on different aspects of research and its applications. Some tasks may require integration of information from various databases. However, determining which entries from different databases represent the same compound is not straightforward. Integration can be based, for example, on automatically generated cross-reference links between entries. Another approach is to use the manually curated links stored directly in databases. This study employs well-established InChI identifiers to measure the consistency and completeness of the manually curated links by comparing them with the automatically generated ones.

Results: We used two different tools to generate InChI identifiers and observed some ambiguities in their outputs. In part, these ambiguities were caused by indistinctness in interpretation of the structural data used. InChI identifiers were used successfully to find duplicate entries in databases. We found that the InChI inconsistencies in the manually curated links are very high (28.85% in the worst case). Even using a weaker definition of consistency, the measured values were very high in general. The completeness of the manually curated links was also very poor (only 93.8% in the best case) compared with that of the automatically generated links.

Conclusions: We observed several problems with the InChI tools and the files used as their inputs. There are large gaps in the consistency and completeness of manually curated links if they are measured using InChI identifiers. However, inconsistency can be caused both by errors in manually curated links and the inherent limitations of the InChI method.

Information
Content Type Off-Site
Uploaded By Steven Wathen
DOI 10.1186/1758-2946-6-15
Content Link https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-6-15
Content Status publish
Number of Comments No Comments
Date Published 01/31/2019
Date Last Modified 01/31/2019
Content Tags Audience, Content type, English, Graduate, Language, Publication, Researcher